The Stonewall
February 3, 2010
It’s a hard world out there, folks, and I want to talk about one aspect of our daily lives that is a source of grief for many: poor communication. On any given day we communicate with loads of people, some familiar and others foreign, and both instances have the ideal result, that you have made yourself understood and further, that you have understood the other individual. Of course, both of these responsibilities are apt to countless miscues which is basically why we have things like war, divorce, and Larry David.
Let’s assume for a second that you represent yourself exactly the way you had intended, with the proper inflection, expression and posture, a rare occurrence for most. Even if, according to you, things go swimmingly, you have no idea how the other party will react. You could cough at an inopportune moment, or have a sudden facial tic, or even have the occasional brain fart that might suggest to the other party that you are being insincere in some way. That’s why I’m of the charitable and compassionate opinion that all misunderstandings have their origin in the other person.
Some of these non-verbal communications convey to the other party much more than a briefly summarized vocal delivery could. Have you ever been engaged in a friendly chit-chat with someone, and they make a real obvious motion to look at their watch? About how long did that exchange last after the person checked the time? The answer is about three seconds, or long enough for them to say “I’ve really got to run, see you later.” It’s these empty motions and gestures that constitute the bulk of our communication which is why experts say that 90% of our communication is done without speaking.
Now I want to talk about a form of non-verbal communication that surpasses the eye-roll, the distracted eye-contact and the smile and nod. The true king of non-verbal communication is something I like to call The Stonewall. Also known as The Cold Shoulder, The Snub, The Walk Away, or the Ignore, this little device communicates more clearly any of the previously mentioned “moves.” In fact, nothing says “I’m not interested in communicating with you” better than saying absolutely nothing at all. Dealing with being incommunicable, those receiving such a shunning have been driven to at worst bouts of hysteria, and at best domestic beer and late-night television.
Part of the power of the stonewall is attributed to its versatility. Most popular of these and easiest to get away with is the telephone stonewall. It’s quite simple to ignore a phone call, or not respond to a text message. But not always is this clearly expressed silence obvious to those naive enough to follow-up on the assumed dropped call or unsuccessfully delivered text. These are the same people who will inevitably find their communications continually bouncing off the very same impenetrable stone wall. Which highlights another feature of the stonewall: the strengthening of its message through repeatability. Some call this the Broken Record approach.
Before continuing let me be clear that I do not condone stonewalling of any kind, having been shamed by it so frequently myself. Allow me now to bring to you a real life instance of the stonewall in hopes that it serve as a cautionary tale.
Imagine if you will a typical gym: people exercising in harmony, a body of citizens united under a common goal of fitness and a clean conscience. I, like many others around me occasionally stop to exchange pleasantries with friends and family when it is convenient to do so. I do not venture to the elliptical section to be friendly lest I be bludgeoned to death with the fury of a thousand thrashing ponytails. So, when an attractive young lady who I had met at a bar the weekend previous walked by my machine I offered a friendly wave. Not an aggressive chin raise (sup), mind you, but the best smile I could muster and a steady hand raise.
This did not elicit a response.
A thousand reasons for this were immediately apparent: her headphones were in – maybe she didn’t hear my wave; it’s a busy landscape – her eyes seemed to take in every detail of the scene around her except my presence; she is distracted by some very complicated and consuming traumatic event in her personal life and is coming to the gym to only work off some stress – I myself feel antisocial sometimes.
I should have seen the warning signs, but this was a gentle stonewall, a pile of pebbles over which I stumbled.
I carried on with my routine which somehow happened to be scattered around the very same corners of the gym where she was working and I allowed the charade to continue. In a flash of brilliance I decided to return the treatment. I’m not here? Fine. Neither are you. This was quite a rush for me as I’m sure you could imagine and I think I managed an extra sit-up or two during the next set. She drifted off to another machine but soon returned to retrieve the water bottle she had left on the ledge next to me. I saw that she was no longer wearing headphones, so I seized the moment to give a more obvious greeting.
“Hi, Stacy” I offered in the friendliest nonchalance I could in a volume that was perhaps unnecessary.
This also did not elicit a response. Her eyes never left the bottle, and I sat there, jaw on the floor, my eyes following her expertly bobbing hair queue while it flit out of sight. I think one of the meatheads who had been checking her out earlier stifled a laugh. Maybe he was right to laugh – only fools try to overcome the insurmountable stonewall a second time. It’s like trying to hit the square block through the triangle hole. Persistence does not prevail, and you wind up looking like a damn fool. But our exchange the weekend prior was very pleasant and non-threatening. Why should future exchanges be any different? Why is she wearing all that spandex if she really doesn’t want any attention? More questions followed, but one thing was clear: this was a public shaming comparable to being thrown naked into the stocks.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is The Stonewall To End All Stonewalls: ignoring of a verbal greeting.
The moral of the story? Don’t shun people: the blogosphere has enough self-pity posts as it is.

February 9, 2010 at 1:00 pm
I knew as soon as I read “stonewall” that this had to do with a woman shooting you down.
Maybe she is hearing impaired? If not she’s mean and you don’t want to hang out with her anyway.
February 11, 2010 at 8:55 am
Nils has a blog. Cool.
February 11, 2010 at 4:51 pm
She’s probably a Browns fan and just hates the world, living in a bubble of isolation until they win a playoff game.
February 12, 2010 at 10:34 am
we are a very speaker-intensive culture. in Korea it’s the opposite. the listener is the one who must figure out the meaning of words, the pitch, timbre and meter with which they are spoken and the extrinsic meaning of those things. in other cultures words are more than the sum of their parts. in gyms in Ohio they are not. i agree with danjewish, she’s totally a browns fan.